Clean Factory's Rolex Sea-dweller 43mm (Model 126600-0002), Comparison with Gen. 

ModernTimeWatch presents you with the latest watch comparison between the Gen and Clean factories: the Sea Dweller 43mm 126600.
P.S.: All images can be clicked and enlarged for high-resolution view, Gen=Genuine, Clean=Clean's Product.

1. Overview ↓
By looking at the front of both watches, I would have to say that the replica is 90% close to the Gen one. Bezel and dial printing, hands, date window, and bracelet are almost the same,
The Gen one has better cleanliness for the front sapphire, this makes the better clarity on the dial than the clean version.
Meanwhile, there are still little flaws on the other side when comparing with Gen version, we will compare each part by viewing the photos below.



2. Luminous Pearl ↓
The pearl on the triangle has little difference. The Gen one is whiter than clean. On the other side, the cutting edge of the triangle is smooth on Clean, and the sizes of pearl and the mounting on the bezel are perfect.


3. Bezel and Crown↓
The black "Cerachrom" Bezel is almost 1:1 as Gen, nothing to complain about that, especially the platinum plating with the numbers engraved and stick index, providing solidarity and excellent light reflection. The depth of teeth on the crown has the same shape as Gen. The teeth on the rim of the bezel are close to Gen, the flaw with it is in the depth and smoothness, the Gen one's teeth are all the same depth and width.

4. Engraved Rehaut↓
The engravings in rehaut is perfect! Nothing to complain with. Alignment of crown and 12 index marker ever better than Gen one. The fonts are almost same.

5. Date Window↓
The Same 2.5x magnifier effect as Gen, with very close date fonts, the date fonts 4 sides, and the calendar plate holder needs to be improved, The Gen version has four sides neatly beveled and connected.

6. Hour Hands and Hand Axis↓
The hour and minute hands are crafted very close to the genuine ones, with sharp tips and polished edges. The luminous filling is also very well done, making it difficult to distinguish from the original with the naked eye. Just like the genuine version, it uses solid hand axles. The second hand has a restoration accuracy of about 90%. One area for improvement is that the second hand is slightly narrower and appears thicker compared to the genuine one. The genuine second hand looks straighter and has a more natural transition.

7. Printing on Dial↓ 
The printing on the dial matches the original, though it would be perfect if the fonts were a bit smaller. Nonetheless, compared to other manufacturers, Clean has done an outstanding job! The "Swiss Made" and the crown at 6 o'clock appear slightly blurred, but it remains the best quality available on the market.

8. Crown and Exhaust Valve↓ 
Compared to the original, Clean's Rolex crown engraving is thicker on the five lines and round dots, and the bottom three dots have similar flaws. However, the gear cutting is perfect, making it almost indistinguishable from the genuine model. The exhaust valve is perfect same as the gen.


9. Metal Bracelet, Clasp and Case Back
Made from 904 steel, the bracelet from C Factory is visually identical to the genuine one. It features fine polishing, with the width and connections of each link matching the original, achieving a high level of accuracy that makes it indistinguishable to the naked eye. The sliding adjustment clasp is crafted with the same technique as the genuine model. The only minor flaw is in the laser-etched engravings, which have slightly less depth compared to the original. The watch's case back is also nearly perfect, with clear gear edges and engraved text that matches the quality of the original.

Overall, this 126600 Sea-Dweller from Factory C has achieved an exceptionally high standard in both craftsmanship and detail. It closely mirrors the quality of the original, showcasing Factory C's leading position in the replica industry. This is a remarkable piece that is well worth purchasing.

Note: The watch comparison information above is for reference only, and there is no guarantee of 100% accuracy. It should not be used as a standard example for authenticating genuine products.

ModernTimeWatch.io

July. 26th, 2024